`.... To anyone familiar with symbols in sacred architecture and design, the difference between the two is obvious. To anyone familiar with the message of Sri Aurobindo and its Vedic con-tent, the difference is equally clear, as is the reason why the Mother insisted on TRANSLUCENCY not transparency. One presents the symbol of Vedic FULLNESS, the other is EMPTINESS. In this way, all the changes introduced have a bearing on the message and lifelong work of the Mother and Sri Aurobindo. They falsify that message. Many are disturbed by this deception. There are two problems we face: one is deception, and two is the impact the changes have on the atmosphere. If nothing more subtle and arcane were considered, this deception at the heart of the township cannot engender the quality of consciousness the Mother envisioned for her township.' ...In 1971, PNB came to the Ashram, y an entire body of knowledge o her, a new cosmology. At the is cosmology was the original I of the Mother's chamber, the t of higher knowledge that the new her vision contained was amply borne out by the cosmology. In deed, it was revealed that the Mother 's original plan was worthy of the highest heights of Vedic drishti and shruti. nothing like it had appeared on this Earth since the time of the Great Pyramid at Giza in Egypt, and perhaps the early Vedic constructions, (vedi). Sacred geometry lay at the heart of the vision a d very precise measurements the Mother gave in her original plan. Indeed, it had to be 'precise, otherwise this phenomenal vision could not reveal the `sense' that she knew it to contain.'